nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
11,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Team Supply Siders (view source)
Revision as of 21:39, November 13, 2007
, 21:39, November 13, 2007→Images: re
I never received a question from you about that, Joaquín. Sorry I missed it. However I do not think it fair to be given points for both. If you take points for uploading a picture, fine. But then I would say you should not take more points for adding that same picture into an article. Make sense? What do others think? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:26, 13 November 2007 (EST)
I never received a question from you about that, Joaquín. Sorry I missed it. However I do not think it fair to be given points for both. If you take points for uploading a picture, fine. But then I would say you should not take more points for adding that same picture into an article. Make sense? What do others think? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:26, 13 November 2007 (EST)
:I have not been adding points for uploading a pic. The points system doesn't allow for that.
:I do see a situation where you can have multiple points for the same pic. I received 4 points for adding ''Image:Vetsday07.jpg'' to the [[Veterans Day]] article. I also received 2 points for adding the same pic to the On ''Veterans Day 2007, Remembering America's Sacrifice'' Breaking News article. I believe this was justified because I added the pic to different articles. I did <u>not</u> add extra points for uploading the photo though. I think that would be unreasonable. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 16:39, 13 November 2007 (EST)