216
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93:
Line 93: +
Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? (view source)
Revision as of 03:01, November 14, 2007
, 03:01, November 14, 2007→Flawed First Premise
Why are both notions absurd? You've provided no reasons at all; simply declared them to be so. I guess you are right though—there's going to be no rational debate if you simply declare things to be so.
Why are both notions absurd? You've provided no reasons at all; simply declared them to be so. I guess you are right though—there's going to be no rational debate if you simply declare things to be so.
:I'm saying the notion of a talking snake is absurd because there is no suggestion of it anywhere in the realm of empirical knowledge. I guess what I'm saying is that I have no problems with you believing this stuff if it gets you through the night, but your arguments here are intellectually dishonest. [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 22:01, 13 November 2007 (EST)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:28, 13 November 2007 (EST)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:28, 13 November 2007 (EST)