511
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + + + + +
→Theory, not fact
:You've been blocked many times for this same edit, under different user names, establishing the fact that you'd rather be a liar. Atoms are fact, not theory; theories don't photograph at all. We would all appreciate the fact that you don't come back. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:16, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
:You've been blocked many times for this same edit, under different user names, establishing the fact that you'd rather be a liar. Atoms are fact, not theory; theories don't photograph at all. We would all appreciate the fact that you don't come back. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:16, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
::Adam is made of dirt and sand, but nowhere does the Bible say that dirt and sand aren't made up of atoms. So... what's the problem exactly? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:43, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
::Adam is made of dirt and sand, but nowhere does the Bible say that dirt and sand aren't made up of atoms. So... what's the problem exactly? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:43, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
:::This is an interesting one and something that is heard quite a lot in many other debates such as evolution. Things can be both fact and theory. Take gravity, for example. Gravity is a fact. It exists. If it didn't... well, you know.
:::But there are theories of gravity. At the moment, it is Einstein's Theory of General Relativity that explains it; before that Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation.
:::Atoms exist, of that there is fundamentally no doubt. But there are various theories that explain what atoms are, how they are made up, how they react, etc.
:::Fact and theory.
:::Hope that helps. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:14, 14 November 2007 (EST)