25
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 125:
Line 125: − +
Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? (view source)
Revision as of 18:52, November 14, 2007
, 18:52, November 14, 2007no edit summary
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:47, 13 November 2007 (EST)
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:47, 13 November 2007 (EST)
You make some great points, obviously you're well read! I guess Genesis 1 is disputed because it is at odds with what we are taught at school and by the aethist media. Regards, Adam
You make some great points, but couldn't Genesis 1 be read as six periods, or creation steps instead of six literal days? Regards, Adam