953
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + +
no edit summary
::Oh sorry. It was the [[User:Aschlafly | Boss]]' edit. I'm chilly already, but, hey, thanks for the advice. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 18:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
::Oh sorry. It was the [[User:Aschlafly | Boss]]' edit. I'm chilly already, but, hey, thanks for the advice. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 18:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Awesome! :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Awesome! :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Actually if you look around you'll find other possible reasons that Damadian at least didn't get the Nobel (I'm not familiar with Hoyle). See, for example: [http://whyfiles.org/188nobel_mri/2.html]. It would be more accurate to say that some think it's because of his view of evolution, or something to that effect, since clearly other reasons have been put forth.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 23:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)