nsAm_Govt_101_ta
862
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: − + + − + + + + + − + + + + − Line 54:
Line 61: − 2 2 2 4+ + +
User:MexMax/Contest3 (view source)
Revision as of 23:17, November 16, 2007
, 23:17, November 16, 2007→Friday, November 16
<br />
<br />
==Wednesday, November 14 (92 as of 12:36 EST)==
==Wednesday, November 14 (124 as of 12:36 EST)==
*Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6
*Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6
*Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2
*Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2
*Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2
*Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2
*Medium regular articles (6): 1
*Medium regular articles (6): 1
*32 from random business.
<br />
<br />
==Thursday, November 15==
==Thursday, November 15 (153 and still going!)==
*Minor edits (2p):
*Major edits (4p):
*Short wanted page (7p):
*Short page (4p):
<br />
<br />
==Friday, November 16==
==Friday, November 16==
*Minor edits (2p): III
*Major edits (4p): I
*Short wanted page (7p):
*Short page (4p):
<br />
<br />
==Saturday, November 17==
==Saturday, November 17==
==Not Yet Totaled==
==Not Yet Totaled==
(32 added above the line)
I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise. I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!