nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46:
Line 46: + + + + + + + +
Suppression of alternatives to evolution (view source)
Revision as of 02:29, November 15, 2007
, 02:29, November 15, 2007Start peer review section
=== Court challenges ===
=== Court challenges ===
=== Peer review ===
A frequent criticism of creationism and Intelligent Design is that they fail to pass [[peer review]], and cannot therefore be considered scientific.
Creationists and Intelligent Design proponents counter that they fail to pass peer review on the grounds of ideology, not scientific merit.
One columnist wrote:{{QuoteBox|Note the circularity: Critics of ID have long argued that the theory was unscientific because it had not been put forward in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Now that it has, they argue that it shouldn't have been because it's unscientific.<ref>Klinghoffer, 2005</ref>}}
== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==