Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
277 bytes added ,  14:59, November 15, 2007
Line 18: Line 18:  
:The sickle hemoglobin is sometimes used as evidence for evolution (as opposed to creation), and I suspect that is why it was included in this article.  However, leading creationists only dispute ''information-gaining'' mutations, and accept that there are ''information-losing'' mutations, such as apoliproprotein AI, which result in a gain of function or a benefit in some circumstances.[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2107]
 
:The sickle hemoglobin is sometimes used as evidence for evolution (as opposed to creation), and I suspect that is why it was included in this article.  However, leading creationists only dispute ''information-gaining'' mutations, and accept that there are ''information-losing'' mutations, such as apoliproprotein AI, which result in a gain of function or a benefit in some circumstances.[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2107]
 
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:54, 12 November 2007 (EST)
 
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:54, 12 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:I will look into the APO-AIM but for now if it does not meet the standards then it should be left out.  The HIV example though I know meets because it also increased the size of the genome of HIV.  So I will add it in.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 09:59, 15 November 2007 (EST)
nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW
461

edits

Navigation menu