Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,103 bytes added ,  15:00, November 19, 2007
a start
State judges are typically elected for fixed terms in the [[United States]]. In fact, in 39 states, some or all judges are elected by the people for fixed durations.<ref>http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9413718</ref> This is in contrast to [[federal]] judges and [[British]] judges, who are appointed for life.

A map indicating the selection process for judges in each of the 50 states is available.<ref>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/justice/que/map.html</ref>

As a general rule, the weaker the democratic control over judges, the more [[liberal]] they are in their rulings. For example, the [[Massachusetts]] judges who ordered the granting of [[same-sex marriage]] licenses were not elected and do not face reelection. The [[New Mexico]] judges who interpreted its state [[Equal Rights Amendment]] as requiring taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] were initially appointed, in contrast with the elected [[Pennsylvania]] judges who ruled that its state [[Equal Rights Amendment]] does not require taxpayer-funded [[abortion]].

== References ==

<references/>
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,215

edits

Navigation menu