Changes

The replacement of [[moderate]] [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] by [[conservative]] Justice [[Samuel Alito]] makes it possible to overturn the following [[liberal]] Court decisions:

The replacement of [[moderate]] [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] by [[conservative]] Justice [[Samuel Alito]] makes it possible to overturn the following [[liberal]] Court decisions:

#[[Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock]], 489 U.S. 1 (1989), a 6-3 decision invalidating a tax exemption limited to the sale of religious literature by religious organizations as preferential support of religion in violation of the [[Establishment Clause]]; Marshall and O'Connor were since replaced by Thomas and Alito.

#''[[Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock]]'', 489 U.S. 1 (1989), a 6-3 decision invalidating a tax exemption limited to the sale of religious literature by religious organizations as preferential support of religion in violation of the [[Establishment Clause]]; Marshall and O'Connor were since replaced by Thomas and Alito.

#''[[Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed.]]'', a 5-4 decision establishing a cause of action for retaliation under [[Title IX]]

#''[[Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed.]]'', a 5-4 decision establishing a cause of action for retaliation under [[Title IX]]

#''[[Hibbs v. Winn]]'', a 5-4 decision rejecting application of the [[Tax Injunction Act]] to an [[Establishment Clause]] challenge to income-tax credits for payments to organizations that award educational scholarships and tuition grants to children attending private schools in [[Arizona]].

#''[[Hibbs v. Winn]]'', a 5-4 decision rejecting application of the [[Tax Injunction Act]] to an [[Establishment Clause]] challenge to income-tax credits for payments to organizations that award educational scholarships and tuition grants to children attending private schools in [[Arizona]].