Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − +
Essay:Gun Control Case (view source)
Revision as of 23:14, November 20, 2007
, 23:14, November 20, 2007improved
"Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?"
"Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?"
The [[conservative]] view is that it is irrelevant whether individuals are affiliated with a state-regulated militia. Putting that in the question shows the liberals already have the upper hand.
The [[conservative]] view is that it is irrelevant whether individuals are affiliated with a state-regulated militia. Putting that in the question suggests that the [[liberal]]s already have the upper hand in this case, though not with [[American]] voters.
== Contrary Opinion ==
== Contrary Opinion ==