Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
cat
Line 3: Line 3:  
In the case, 70% of physicians in Maricopa County (which includes Phoenix) agreed not to charge patients more than set fees for specific services.  The physicians argued that this benefited consumers (patients), but the Court found it to be automatically illegal under the antitrust laws due to the risk of abuse whenever any horizontal (among competitors) price-fixing occurs.
 
In the case, 70% of physicians in Maricopa County (which includes Phoenix) agreed not to charge patients more than set fees for specific services.  The physicians argued that this benefited consumers (patients), but the Court found it to be automatically illegal under the antitrust laws due to the risk of abuse whenever any horizontal (among competitors) price-fixing occurs.
   −
[[Category:Law]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,910

edits

Navigation menu