Changes

"Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?"

"Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?"

   

   

The [[conservative]] view is that it is irrelevant whether individuals are affiliated with a state-regulated militia.  Putting that in the question suggests that the [[liberal]]s already have the upper hand in this case, though not with [[American]] voters.{{fact}}

The [[conservative]] view is that it is irrelevant whether individuals are affiliated with a state-regulated militia.  Putting that in the question suggests that the [[liberal]]s already have the upper hand in this case, though not with [[American]] voters.<ref>"The third rail. Iowans are noticing the candidates don't say much on gun control." [http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/10/the_daily_2008_154.html]</ref>

== Contrary Opinion ==

== Contrary Opinion ==