44
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: − +
→Wikipedia or Conservapedia?: Fixed
== Wikipedia or Conservapedia? ==
== Wikipedia or Conservapedia? ==
What do I think is the better encyclopedia? Wikipedia of course! We (conservapedia) are not even an encyclopedia. We are a website full of conservative jargon. On the otherhand, wikipedia is an encyclopedia that contains information, and is less biased. I hate to break it too you, but conservapedia is '''far''' more biased than wikipedia. Stop being critical of wikipedia for being biased...hypocrits!
What do I think is the better encyclopedia? Wikipedia of course! We (conservapedia) are not even an encyclopedia. We are a website full of conservative jargon. On the otherhand, wikipedia is an encyclopedia that contains information, and is less biased. I hate to break it too you, but conservapedia is '''far''' more biased than wikipedia.
As for wikipedia, it is biased, and not perfect. There is no sense of community there. I would much rather being here:) We are better than wikipedia when it comes to our community. The people I have had contact with here have been very friendly. I have not ran into a single unfriendly person here so far. Wikipedia has friendly people, but the percent of friendly users here is higher.
As for wikipedia, it is biased, and not perfect. There is no sense of community there. I would much rather being here:) We are better than wikipedia when it comes to our community. The people I have had contact with here have been very friendly. I have not ran into a single unfriendly person here so far. Wikipedia has friendly people, but the percent of friendly users here is higher.
In conclusion, wikipedia and conservapedia are equal. This is a friendly place too work, but when it comes to doing research, I would go to wikipedia first.
In conclusion, wikipedia and conservapedia are equal. This is a friendly place too work, but when it comes to doing research, I would go to wikipedia first.