nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 171:
Line 171: + + + + + + +
Primeq's edits
I don't object to having young earth bias in the articles, but to say that if you don't believe in a young earth, you're an atheist, that really offends me. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:28, 23 November 2007 (EST)
I don't object to having young earth bias in the articles, but to say that if you don't believe in a young earth, you're an atheist, that really offends me. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:28, 23 November 2007 (EST)
== Primeq's edits ==
The reason I reverted Primeq's edits are as follows:
* The edit was a POV argument regarding how one should use or not use sources. As such it has no place in an article about the moon, although would be appropriate on this talk page.
* The logic was faulty. There is nothing inconsistent with quoting a source with regard to ''observed facts'' whilst dismissing that source with regard to ''unobserved belief''.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:35, 23 November 2007 (EST)