Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
46 bytes added ,  00:45, November 24, 2007
→‎Primeq's edits: Please sign all posts with FOUR " ~ "
Line 229: Line 229:  
::No, people frequently believe two contradictory things, so Christians (i.e. theists) believing something that is inherently atheistic does not mean that they are not Christians.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:13, 23 November 2007 (EST)
 
::No, people frequently believe two contradictory things, so Christians (i.e. theists) believing something that is inherently atheistic does not mean that they are not Christians.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:13, 23 November 2007 (EST)
   −
The question remains - why are we cherry-picking NASA's statements? Does anyone fully understand and can they ratify the laser-interferomtry techniques supposedly used to measure the rate of moon-recedence? Are there reasons to believe the laser-measurements, yet disbelieve the isotope-ratio techniques used to age the moon? I'm sensing a disturbing ethic here of selective accreditation. I'm going to need some help. Regardless of these edits which (out of respect for the Conservapedia social-contract)I will not merely just re-enter and thereby start a cycle of edit/revert followed by account cancellation, I do believe some kind of statement of moon-age is warranted.
+
The question remains - why are we cherry-picking NASA's statements? Does anyone fully understand and can they ratify the laser-interferomtry techniques supposedly used to measure the rate of moon-recedence? Are there reasons to believe the laser-measurements, yet disbelieve the isotope-ratio techniques used to age the moon? I'm sensing a disturbing ethic here of selective accreditation. I'm going to need some help. Regardless of these edits which (out of respect for the Conservapedia social-contract)I will not merely just re-enter and thereby start a cycle of edit/revert followed by account cancellation, I do believe some kind of statement of moon-age is warranted. {{unsigned|Primeq}} --17:38, 23 November 2007
    
== "Many" atheists edit ==
 
== "Many" atheists edit ==
    
I reverted the qualifier "many" from "promoted by many atheists".  Old earth theories are promoted by atheists.  There is no denying that.  Virtually all atheists believe in old earth theories.  Very few, or none, Catholics or any other Christian promotes old earth theories.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:23, 23 November 2007 (EST)
 
I reverted the qualifier "many" from "promoted by many atheists".  Old earth theories are promoted by atheists.  There is no denying that.  Virtually all atheists believe in old earth theories.  Very few, or none, Catholics or any other Christian promotes old earth theories.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:23, 23 November 2007 (EST)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu