Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,112 bytes added ,  02:13, November 24, 2007
→‎Challenges: reply and second challenge
Line 24: Line 24:     
*Honestly, I'm not sure while this review of the results are being done.  The Supply Siders out scored the Timberwolves by over 3000 points, and the only thing in dispute seems to be my edits.  Even if you subtract the points for my edits, the Supply siders would still win by a very healthy margin.  Moreover, point audits have never been done in prior contests.  Why not simply declare the winner on the front page as has been the process in the past.  [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 20:16, 23 November 2007 (EST)
 
*Honestly, I'm not sure while this review of the results are being done.  The Supply Siders out scored the Timberwolves by over 3000 points, and the only thing in dispute seems to be my edits.  Even if you subtract the points for my edits, the Supply siders would still win by a very healthy margin.  Moreover, point audits have never been done in prior contests.  Why not simply declare the winner on the front page as has been the process in the past.  [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 20:16, 23 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
::I don't think the challenges are over.  The gap of 3000 points is not terribly large.  I'm about to add another challenge for over 2000 points, and there may be further challenges both to protect the integrity of the contest, certify appropriate point totals, and enhance the level of play for the future.  Don't take it personally!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:13, 23 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
*Challenge to User:BrianCo for his massive 2433 points merely for linking within American Government Lectures.  While those points are probably legitimate in a strictly literal reading of the rules, I question whether the judges want to credit such a one-sided approach, without comparable substantive contributions to other entries.  User:BrianCo is a great contributor and this challenge does not suggest any foul play or anything unfair, but the spirit of the contest and this imbalance in point totals may call for an adjustment or reconsideration of that approach for future contests.  Well done, BrianCo, but perhaps a bit too well done!  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:13, 23 November 2007 (EST)
    
== Judges ==
 
== Judges ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Navigation menu