Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 162: Line 162:     
Are there any sources besides those accusing the gay agenda?  There's no evidence of any organized "agenda", and all of the goals and such are provided by those opposing it.  Best case, this is an article about a pundit talking point, and worst case it's a conspiracy theory masked as an encyclopedia article.  Shouldn't it at least mention that there has never been any evidence of even a mildly organized or centralized gay agenda?  The fact that it's permanently locked further undermines CP credibility.  [[User:RWest|RWest]] 12:32, 13 November 2007 (EST)
 
Are there any sources besides those accusing the gay agenda?  There's no evidence of any organized "agenda", and all of the goals and such are provided by those opposing it.  Best case, this is an article about a pundit talking point, and worst case it's a conspiracy theory masked as an encyclopedia article.  Shouldn't it at least mention that there has never been any evidence of even a mildly organized or centralized gay agenda?  The fact that it's permanently locked further undermines CP credibility.  [[User:RWest|RWest]] 12:32, 13 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
Specific suggestion:
 +
:Focus on the Family quotes below from a leading book in the homosexual movement which outlines the points of the homosexual agenda:
 +
There is no source cited here. The source is "The Overhauling of Straight America," an article which appeared in the November 1987 issue of a gay magazine called ''The Guide''. [[User:Shii|Shii]] 22:44, 23 November 2007 (EST)
18

edits

Navigation menu