Changes

:Wrong, wrong, wrong.

:Wrong, wrong, wrong.

:Unfortunately, it '''most definitely does''' violate Wikipedia's GFDL, in '''two ways.'''  

:Unfortunately, it '''most definitely does''' violate Wikipedia's GFDL, in '''two ways.'''  

:First, the GFDL does not allow re-use of GFDL-licensed content ''unless the copy is also licensed under GFDL.'' Since Conservapedia does '''not''' license its material under the GFDL, Conservapedia '''cannot''' use GFDL material whether verbatim or modified.

:First, the GFDL does not allow re-use of GFDL-licensed content ''unless the copy is also licensed under GFDL.'' Since Conservapedia does '''not''' license its material under the GFDL, Conservapedia '''cannot''' use GFDL material whether verbatim or modified. Ditto Creative Commons or other "free" licenses.

:Second, the link you cite says clearly that simple verbatim copying of an article article is allowed ''only with restrictions.'' You seem to be focussing on the "allowed" part and conveniently ignoring the restrictions. Three of them are:  

:Second, the link you cite says clearly that simple verbatim copying of an article article is allowed ''only with restrictions.'' You seem to be focussing on the "allowed" part and conveniently ignoring the restrictions. Three of them are:  

::*"You may not add, remove, or change any content or links within the Main Text..."  

::*"You may not add, remove, or change any content or links within the Main Text..."