nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 237:
Line 237: + +
→Old Earth
:: OK, now how about a worldwide flood ''after'' the origin of man? There is limestone in every part of the world, at every altitude. There are salt-water lakes inland and high altitudes. There's no doubting that a worldwide flood occurred after the origin of life, as limestone can only be formed from the sidement of living organisms. The [[Grand Canyon]] can only plausibly be explained as having been formed by a flood. But many old earthers will deny all this to erode [[faith]], particularly in students. Dan, what's your view?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:39, 24 November 2007 (EST)
:: OK, now how about a worldwide flood ''after'' the origin of man? There is limestone in every part of the world, at every altitude. There are salt-water lakes inland and high altitudes. There's no doubting that a worldwide flood occurred after the origin of life, as limestone can only be formed from the sidement of living organisms. The [[Grand Canyon]] can only plausibly be explained as having been formed by a flood. But many old earthers will deny all this to erode [[faith]], particularly in students. Dan, what's your view?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:39, 24 November 2007 (EST)
:My view is the same as Greg Neyman - universal flood but local in nature. However, I didn't come to the site to promote science - I came to promote a Christian worldview and political conservatism. I feel demonized, by being accused of promoting atheism and rejecting God (as evidenced by the last comment of Phillip's reply to me - that's really what it says.) I don't wish to make anybody believe the same I do about origins - I simply want to be accepted as a Christian with a different view on the issue, just as one with multiple denominations. I am going to need some time to reconsider my role on this project. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 12:34, 24 November 2007 (EST)
=== Reply to DanH ===
=== Reply to DanH ===