Changes

::*So you cling to insulting others, by saying your way, or none at all, Philip?  Your "truth" is greater than others?  If that is not what you are saying, why do you insist upon always stating it as absolute "truth" and "fact", instead of qualifying it as the beliefs of a small minority of Christians?  Doing so does not denigrate what you believe, or make it wrong. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font>} 19:57, 23 November 2007 (EST)   

::*So you cling to insulting others, by saying your way, or none at all, Philip?  Your "truth" is greater than others?  If that is not what you are saying, why do you insist upon always stating it as absolute "truth" and "fact", instead of qualifying it as the beliefs of a small minority of Christians?  Doing so does not denigrate what you believe, or make it wrong. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font>} 19:57, 23 November 2007 (EST)   

:::Jesus said that He was the ''only'' way to God.  There's nothing wrong with saying that one thing is the truth ''if it is'' the truth.  Truth is greater than lie; I'm merely claiming that a young Earth is the truth.  If you want to refute that, fine, but you won't get far refuting it by asserting that I'm not allowed to claim it as the truth.  To qualify it as the beliefs of a small minority of Christians would be very misleading, given that it has been the traditional view of Bible-believers for thousands of years, and is still accepted by a significant and growing number of Bible-believers.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:22, 24 November 2007 (EST){{fact}}

:::Jesus said that He was the ''only'' way to God.  There's nothing wrong with saying that one thing is the truth ''if it is'' the truth.  Truth is greater than lie; I'm merely claiming that a young Earth is the truth.  If you want to refute that, fine, but you won't get far refuting it by asserting that I'm not allowed to claim it as the truth.  To qualify it as the beliefs of a small minority of Christians would be very misleading, given that it has been the traditional view of Bible-believers for thousands of years, and is still accepted by a significant and growing number of Bible-believers.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:22, 24 November 2007 (EST)

The question remains - why are we cherry-picking NASA's statements? Does anyone fully understand and can they ratify the laser-interferomtry techniques supposedly used to measure the rate of moon-recedence? Are there reasons to believe the laser-measurements, yet disbelieve the isotope-ratio techniques used to age the moon? I'm sensing a disturbing ethic here of selective accreditation. I'm going to need some help. Regardless of these edits which (out of respect for the Conservapedia social-contract)I will not merely just re-enter and thereby start a cycle of edit/revert followed by account cancellation, I do believe some kind of statement of moon-age is warranted. {{unsigned|Primeq}} --17:38, 23 November 2007

The question remains - why are we cherry-picking NASA's statements? Does anyone fully understand and can they ratify the laser-interferomtry techniques supposedly used to measure the rate of moon-recedence? Are there reasons to believe the laser-measurements, yet disbelieve the isotope-ratio techniques used to age the moon? I'm sensing a disturbing ethic here of selective accreditation. I'm going to need some help. Regardless of these edits which (out of respect for the Conservapedia social-contract)I will not merely just re-enter and thereby start a cycle of edit/revert followed by account cancellation, I do believe some kind of statement of moon-age is warranted. {{unsigned|Primeq}} --17:38, 23 November 2007