3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 75:
Line 75: + +
→Forfeit of Contest: Pots & kettles
: As [[conservatives]], we welcome accountability and we should accept it in a sportsmanlike manner. That applies to me, and to all of us. And, yes, there are contests where the outcome is subject to post-contest challenges. This occurs in the Olympics, for example. You'd have a hard time finding a contest where each player awards his own points and then objects to post-contest review by an independent referee or judge! Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:14, 25 November 2007 (EST)
: As [[conservatives]], we welcome accountability and we should accept it in a sportsmanlike manner. That applies to me, and to all of us. And, yes, there are contests where the outcome is subject to post-contest challenges. This occurs in the Olympics, for example. You'd have a hard time finding a contest where each player awards his own points and then objects to post-contest review by an independent referee or judge! Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:14, 25 November 2007 (EST)
::Isn't the dispense of rulings in an unfair manner, making up new rules and new interpretations off the cuff how Conservapedia works? Pots, kettles and black comes to mind.[[User:SimonGordon|SimonGordon]] 14:06, 25 November 2007 (EST)
== Judges ==
== Judges ==