Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 415: Line 415:     
: Wikipedia allows editing by anonymous IP addresses, and those edits are often [[liberal]] smears of people.  I think Wikipedia's bias is one reason why it continues to allow this practice.  Conservapedia does not allow editing by anonymous IPs.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:55, 24 November 2007 (EST)
 
: Wikipedia allows editing by anonymous IP addresses, and those edits are often [[liberal]] smears of people.  I think Wikipedia's bias is one reason why it continues to allow this practice.  Conservapedia does not allow editing by anonymous IPs.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:55, 24 November 2007 (EST)
 +
:: I've done vandalism patrol before, and I promise you this: the vast majority of vandalism is by idiots who think inserting nonsense or deleting content is clever. Not smears, just idiocy. If there happens to be a source that ''conclusively'' contradicts what I'm saying, go ahead and cite it.
 +
:: The only routine vandalism that could possibly be seen as a smear is vandalism to political articles. Many prominent politicians have 3 or more pieces of vaguely insulting vandalism per week. One example is an edit by a 3 edit user to George W. Bush's page that inserted "He is considered by many as the worst president in modern American history." That edit was reverted by a certain Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington. [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] [[User_talk:PostoStudanto| ✉Tλlk]] 20:30, 25 November 2007 (EST)
    
== Dawkins again ==
 
== Dawkins again ==
    
Can somebody tell me how the the Oxford statement "was appointed Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at the University of Oxford." continued?  [[User:Order|Order]] 18:19, 25 November 2007 (EST)
 
Can somebody tell me how the the Oxford statement "was appointed Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at the University of Oxford." continued?  [[User:Order|Order]] 18:19, 25 November 2007 (EST)

Navigation menu