This matter directly stems from the SSchultz controversy. At bar is whether or not points should be allowed for editing junk entries. We feel that this should not be, and consequently disqualify all such edits. Points are granted for improving CP. Junk articles do not improve CP, therefore no points are awarded. It would be unfair to allow edits to these articles to count, as that would open the doors to a flood of garbage.
+
This matter directly stems from the SSchultz controversy. At bar is whether or not points should be allowed for editing entries which were disqualified by the judges for their very limited nature. We feel that this should not be, and consequently disqualify all such edits. We feel that, when the rules are vague, the guiding principle should be that points are granted for improving Conservapedia. This applies not only to the individual edit made, but to the whole article. Greg made contributions which would normally be helpful, however they were made to pages which should not have been there in the first place. For these reasons, we have determined that the points gained by removing the template from the pages in question shall be negated.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 23:32, 25 November 2007 (EST)
[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 23:32, 25 November 2007 (EST)
+
<br />[[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:46, 25 November 2007 (EST)