6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + +
File talk:Guernica.jpg (view source)
Revision as of 12:45, November 28, 2007
, 12:45, November 28, 2007moral?
::::What this user and his sock intended to do was to harp on just us about this particular image, and not any other website that displayed it, such a Wikipedia. Such use is permitted not just under "fair use" laws but under the terms of ''Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'', case citation 36 F. Supp. 2d 191, which that copies of images in the public domain could not be protected by copyright because the copies are not original or lack originality. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:52, 27 November 2007 (EST)
::::What this user and his sock intended to do was to harp on just us about this particular image, and not any other website that displayed it, such a Wikipedia. Such use is permitted not just under "fair use" laws but under the terms of ''Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.'', case citation 36 F. Supp. 2d 191, which that copies of images in the public domain could not be protected by copyright because the copies are not original or lack originality. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:52, 27 November 2007 (EST)
::That seems to be what the law says an may well have cleared things. All the same, is it morally correct to ignore the originators of the reproductions' wishes and simply take (steal?) their reproductions rather than put the time and effort in to creating one's own?
::[[User:DaleHill|DaleHill]] 07:45, 28 November 2007 (EST)