Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 64: Line 64:     
RE your claim about Wikipedia's article JESUS H. CHRIST. It simply tries to be neutral, gives several examples and notes that it can be considered blasphemy.  Get a life![[User:Alloco1|Alloco1]] 10:57, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
 
RE your claim about Wikipedia's article JESUS H. CHRIST. It simply tries to be neutral, gives several examples and notes that it can be considered blasphemy.  Get a life![[User:Alloco1|Alloco1]] 10:57, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Although this is the wrong place to bring this up, 'Alloco1' is right - the wikipedia page for 'Jesus H. Christ' mentions that the phrase is considered blasphemy.
    
== Answer to TerryH, re universal applicability of the Bible ==
 
== Answer to TerryH, re universal applicability of the Bible ==
2

edits

Navigation menu