Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
599 bytes added ,  21:20, November 28, 2007
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
Your edits are interesting. Welcome!
+
==Question==
 +
Don't know if this is the right place, but I want to know --if it's not very touchy for you-- about the FBI investigations on vandalism. In Christ --[[User:Eury|Eury]] 23:14, 18 September 2007 (EDT)
   −
I need to shut down editing soon tonight.  Will reopen for editing early tomorrow (Wednesday) morning.  Please feel free to create entries offline to enter when general editing is reopened. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:23, 28 November 2007 (EST)
+
Yeah, how is that investigation going, have you guys caught the Halifax troll yet? Maybe you can get the FBI after him. Oh wait I forgot they don't have any jurisdiction in Canada. Looks like you guys are shit out of luck --[[User:Cochabamba|Cochabamba]] 12:09, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
   −
Please use talk pages before mass removing information from articles. If you persist, you may be blocked. Thank you. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:24, 28 November 2007 (EST)
+
So what happens to the people the FBI catches, are they sent to Gitmo? --[[User:Kucinichforlife|Kucinichforlife]] 12:20, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
   −
+
Yeah they are and then the army rapes them up the ass with a broomstick --[[User:Edwards4pres|Edwards4pres]] 12:24, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
You removed an entire paragraph, which said:
  −
Combined with [[hate speech]] rules and [[hate crime]] laws, a government certification of "same-sex marriage" will place tremendous pressure on people who criticize homosexuality. "How do you know we're not married?" would be the simplest of rejoinders. Or, "How dare you criticize my spouse!" (see [[fighting words]]).
  −
Such laws will open up a new wave of militant homosexual violence. Just as "He insulted my wife" can be used as defense against an [[assault]] charge.
  −
Attempts to refer to [[civil union]]s as "marriage", or to require people who disagree with homosexuality to honor such unions. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:28, 28 November 2007 (EST)
     −
Oops, you're right. Please accept my apologies. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:32, 28 November 2007 (EST)
+
So why do you guys keep reverting the questions, could it be that there really is no FBI investigation and you are all lying. Looks like liberals aren't the only ones capable of deceit eh? --[[User:Cochabamba|Cochabamba]] 13:03, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
   −
:Good work. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:40, 28 November 2007 (EST)
+
So how come you guys don't have an article on [[Conservative deceit]]? This is a conservative site and it is full of it. Are you going to send the FBI after me ;) --[[User:Mikegravelforpres|Mikegravelforpres]] 13:16, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
   −
==[[Michael Crichton]]==
+
What's wrong Karajou, does the truth hurt? Send the FBI up to Halifax to get me asshole --[[User:Osamaobama|Osamaobama]] 13:32, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
   −
:cobbling together a few quotes by a popular novelist
+
What's wrong, can't stomach dissenting views. Just expunge dissenting views from the public record. Welcome to 1984 --[[User:Ronpaulvandamn|Ronpaulvandamn]] 13:57, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
   −
Dr. Crichton is more than a "popular novelist". Although he is best known for his novels (and television's "[[ER]]"), he is also a graduate of Harvard Medical School and a former postdoctoral fellow at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies. [http://www.sitewave.net/news/s49p1835.htm]
+
Are you guys going to answer any questions or are you too scared? --[[User:Kucinichforlife|Kucinichforlife]] 16:58, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
   −
If you can see a way to improve any of the science [[stub]]s I've created today, please join in at any time. Conservapedia is a collaborative work. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:49, 28 November 2007 (EST)
+
Steve Carson is a hero! By the way, how is that FBI investigation going? Will the Feds catch Steve Carson? Please let us know!
 +
 
 +
You know you guys are such hypocrites and I don't associate with hypocrites --[[User:SebastianValmont|SebastianValmont]] 18:19, 9 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 
 +
Are you guys going to delete the page again, you are such cowards --[[User:Coldhandstara|Coldhandstara]] 18:23, 9 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 
 +
Why do you delete the page TK, afraid of something? --[[User:Snuffaluffacus|Snuffaluffacus]] 18:31, 9 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 
 +
Is it too embarrassing for you, there is no FBI investigation, just admit it --[[User:CecileCaldwell|CecileCaldwell]] 22:14, 9 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 
 +
Why don't you just answer the question when people ask you about the FBI rather than burning the evidence --[[User:Tara|Tara]] 16:19, 28 November 2007 (EST)
32

edits

Navigation menu