| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Question==
| + | '''Climate change''' is one of the top environmental issues, with [[liberal]]s and [[conservative]]s evenly divided on whether recent [[global warming]] is more natural or man-made. |
| − | Don't know if this is the right place, but I want to know --if it's not very touchy for you-- about the FBI investigations on vandalism. In Christ --[[User:Eury|Eury]] 23:14, 18 September 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | Yeah, how is that investigation going, have you guys caught the Halifax troll yet? Maybe you can get the FBI after him. Oh wait I forgot they don't have any jurisdiction in Canada. Looks like you guys are shit out of luck --[[User:Cochabamba|Cochabamba]] 12:09, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| + | The main contention of [[environmentalist]]s like [[Al Gore]] is the argument that: |
| | + | #The earth's atmosphere warmed one or two degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 Centigrade) during the 20th century. |
| | + | #Most of this warming is man-made. |
| | + | #The warming is likely to continue and to be harmful to human, animal and plant life. |
| | + | #We must all work together to stop it by reducing emission of "[[greenhouse gases]]". |
| | | | |
| − | So what happens to the people the FBI catches, are they sent to Gitmo? --[[User:Kucinichforlife|Kucinichforlife]] 12:20, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | Yeah they are and then the army rapes them up the ass with a broomstick --[[User:Edwards4pres|Edwards4pres]] 12:24, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | So why do you guys keep reverting the questions, could it be that there really is no FBI investigation and you are all lying. Looks like liberals aren't the only ones capable of deceit eh? --[[User:Cochabamba|Cochabamba]] 13:03, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| + | Jack M. Hollander wrote: |
| | | | |
| − | So how come you guys don't have an article on [[Conservative deceit]]? This is a conservative site and it is full of it. Are you going to send the FBI after me ;) --[[User:Mikegravelforpres|Mikegravelforpres]] 13:16, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| + | :... climate change remains a fascinating and important scientific subject. Climate dynamics and climate history are extraordinarily complex, and despite intensive study for decades, scientists are not yet able to explain satisfactorily such basic phenomena as extreme weather events ([[hurricane]]s, [[tornado]]es, [[drought]]s), El Nino variations, historical [[climate cycles]], and trends of [[atmospheric temperature]]s. The scientific uncertainties about all these matters are great, and not surprisingly, competent scientists disagree in their interpretations of what is and is not known. [http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-2875898_ITM] |
| | | | |
| − | What's wrong Karajou, does the truth hurt? Send the FBI up to Halifax to get me asshole --[[User:Osamaobama|Osamaobama]] 13:32, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| + | See also: |
| | + | *[[anthropogenic global warming]] |
| | | | |
| − | What's wrong, can't stomach dissenting views. Just expunge dissenting views from the public record. Welcome to 1984 --[[User:Ronpaulvandamn|Ronpaulvandamn]] 13:57, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| + | ==Links== |
| | + | *[http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-2875898_ITM Global warming: both sides] |
| | | | |
| − | Are you guys going to answer any questions or are you too scared? --[[User:Kucinichforlife|Kucinichforlife]] 16:58, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
| + | [[Category:Environmentalism]] |
| − | | |
| − | Steve Carson is a hero! By the way, how is that FBI investigation going? Will the Feds catch Steve Carson? Please let us know!
| |
| − | | |
| − | You know you guys are such hypocrites and I don't associate with hypocrites --[[User:SebastianValmont|SebastianValmont]] 18:19, 9 November 2007 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Are you guys going to delete the page again, you are such cowards --[[User:Coldhandstara|Coldhandstara]] 18:23, 9 November 2007 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Why do you delete the page TK, afraid of something? --[[User:Snuffaluffacus|Snuffaluffacus]] 18:31, 9 November 2007 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Is it too embarrassing for you, there is no FBI investigation, just admit it --[[User:CecileCaldwell|CecileCaldwell]] 22:14, 9 November 2007 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Why don't you just answer the question when people ask you about the FBI rather than burning the evidence --[[User:Tara|Tara]] 16:19, 28 November 2007 (EST)
| |