6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 345:
Line 345: + +
→Reply to All: Non-existant quote of endorsement by a Pope.
:::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:23, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:23, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:::::::::Infallibility is Catholic doctrine, but if you are not Catholic you are free to not accept this doctrine, it won't make it worse :) [[User:Order|Order]] 00:55, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:::::::::Infallibility is Catholic doctrine, but if you are not Catholic you are free to not accept this doctrine, it won't make it worse :) [[User:Order|Order]] 00:55, 29 November 2007 (EST)
Mr. Schlafly I assume you are referring to the citing of 2 Peter 2:4 above. Does Pope John Paul II's [http://www.cin.org/jp2evolu.html Message to Pontifical Academy of Sciences] on October 22, 1996 carry no weight? There he mentions his predecessor Pius XII in his Encyclical Humani generis (1950) ''had already stated that there was no opposition between evolution and the doctrine of the faith about man and his vocation..'' Later he continues ''Today, almost half a century after the publication of the Encyclical, new knowledge has led to the recognition of more than one hypothesis in the theory of evolution. It is indeed remarkable that this theory has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted independently is in itself a significant argument in favour of this theory. [...] The sciences of observation describe and measure the multiple manifestations of life with increasing precision and correlate them with the time line.'' Nowhere is the evolutionary time line explicitly rejected by his Holyness. The above may well be a non-existant quote of endorsement by a Pope. [[User:DaleHill|DaleHill]] 06:26, 29 November 2007 (EST)
== Primeq's edits ==
== Primeq's edits ==