6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 358:
Line 358: + + +
→Reply to All: In light of this enlightenment...
:::: Folks, maybe [[Wikipedia]] is a better place for your misinformation. The [[Pope]], I assure you, accepts one [[Adam]] as the ancestor of all humans and agrees with what [[Peter]] said as quoted above. The [[Old Earth]] is contrary to that, and thus is rejected. Neither DaleHill nor Order can quote anything to to the contrary, because it does not exist except in the wishful thinking of [[atheists]] who reject everything the [[Pope]] stands for anyway.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:::: Folks, maybe [[Wikipedia]] is a better place for your misinformation. The [[Pope]], I assure you, accepts one [[Adam]] as the ancestor of all humans and agrees with what [[Peter]] said as quoted above. The [[Old Earth]] is contrary to that, and thus is rejected. Neither DaleHill nor Order can quote anything to to the contrary, because it does not exist except in the wishful thinking of [[atheists]] who reject everything the [[Pope]] stands for anyway.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:::::Andy, maybe you should have read the encyclical Human Genreris that was quoted. The pope does believe in one Adam, and I for example mentioned it myself that he is fine with evolution as long as it accepts one Adam, and that souls are god given. The pope doesn't think that it has to be contradictory to an Old Earth view, and that is also written in Human Genreris. He believed it so strongly, that he put it into an encyclical, something which is covered by his claim of infallibility. That '''you''' think that and old earth view is incompatible with a single Adam is well known, but it is official that the Catholic Church thinks otherwise. [[User:Order|Order]] 19:39, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:::::Andy, maybe you should have read the encyclical Human Genreris that was quoted. The pope does believe in one Adam, and I for example mentioned it myself that he is fine with evolution as long as it accepts one Adam, and that souls are god given. The pope doesn't think that it has to be contradictory to an Old Earth view, and that is also written in Human Genreris. He believed it so strongly, that he put it into an encyclical, something which is covered by his claim of infallibility. That '''you''' think that and old earth view is incompatible with a single Adam is well known, but it is official that the Catholic Church thinks otherwise. [[User:Order|Order]] 19:39, 29 November 2007 (EST)
::::Mr. Aschlafly. In light of this enlightenment I suggest you rewrite the article [[Pangea]], its Old Earthism may erode your visitors faith: it may get them to believe in things from which disbelief in Christianity logically follows. While you are at it, perhaps review all the articles in the [[:Category:Geology]], there may be others amongst them promoting atheistic concepts. Perhaps some of the articles in the [[:Category:Astronomy]] also need rewritten. In the article [[Universe]], a meticulous Old Earthist explanation is set against a marginalised, weak descripton of the true Christian view which follows at the bottom of the page, giving the impression its not to be taken seriously.
::::[[User:DaleHill|DaleHill]] 08:25, 30 November 2007 (EST)
== Primeq's edits ==
== Primeq's edits ==