2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 360:
Line 360: − +
→Reply to All
:::::: Like erosion, User:Order, you push for concepts that are logically contrary to [[faith]]. Why don't you disclose your own point of view first, so readers can see where you're coming from? What you say about the Pope, with whom I expect you to completely disagree on almost everything, is false. The Old Earthers reject the [[Flood]] circa 3000 B.C., for example, while the Pope must accept it as the first Pope does. Let's be up-front about that also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:53, 30 November 2007 (EST)
:::::: Like erosion, User:Order, you push for concepts that are logically contrary to [[faith]]. Why don't you disclose your own point of view first, so readers can see where you're coming from? What you say about the Pope, with whom I expect you to completely disagree on almost everything, is false. The Old Earthers reject the [[Flood]] circa 3000 B.C., for example, while the Pope must accept it as the first Pope does. Let's be up-front about that also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:53, 30 November 2007 (EST)
:::::::The only concept I push is to accept the fact other people can disagree with your views and are still good Catholics, with the popes approval. If anything it is logically contrary to '''your''' faith. Thanks for asking about my views, but I am not the pope, and we were discussing the popes views. There are official documents by the Vatican detailing the popes view, so we don't have to guess what his views are. Why do you have difficulties to accept that the pope allows for views different from yours? If the pope says that people can be good Catholics and believe in theistic evolution, does it make your beliefs less true? [[User:Order|Order]] 17:25, 30 November 2007 (EST)
::::Mr. Aschlafly. In light of this enlightenment I suggest you rewrite the article [[Pangea]], its Old Earthism may erode your visitors faith: it may get them to believe in things from which disbelief in Christianity logically follows. While you are at it, perhaps review all the articles in the [[:Category:Geology]], there may be others amongst them promoting atheistic concepts. Perhaps some of the articles in the [[:Category:Astronomy]] also need rewritten. In the article [[Universe]], a meticulous Old Earthist explanation is set against a marginalised, weak descripton of the true Christian view which follows at the bottom of the page, giving the impression its not to be taken seriously.
::::Mr. Aschlafly. In light of this enlightenment I suggest you rewrite the article [[Pangea]], its Old Earthism may erode your visitors faith: it may get them to believe in things from which disbelief in Christianity logically follows. While you are at it, perhaps review all the articles in the [[:Category:Geology]], there may be others amongst them promoting atheistic concepts. Perhaps some of the articles in the [[:Category:Astronomy]] also need rewritten. In the article [[Universe]], a meticulous Old Earthist explanation is set against a marginalised, weak descripton of the true Christian view which follows at the bottom of the page, giving the impression its not to be taken seriously.
::::[[User:DaleHill|DaleHill]] 08:25, 30 November 2007 (EST)
::::[[User:DaleHill|DaleHill]] 08:25, 30 November 2007 (EST)