nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 365:
Line 365: + + + + + + + +
Andy requested sources and quotes
:::::::::I'm not sure why you're debating evolution on the talk page for the moon, but he's not pretending anything, not trying to fool anyone, and not spreading misinformation... here's a source: http://catholicism.about.com/b/2007/08/04/evolution-and-catholicism-compatible-pope-says.htm . Happy to help, although I doubt that this will be the end of the discussion. --[[User:BillOhannity|BillOhannity]] 18:56, 30 November 2007 (EST)
:::::::::I'm not sure why you're debating evolution on the talk page for the moon, but he's not pretending anything, not trying to fool anyone, and not spreading misinformation... here's a source: http://catholicism.about.com/b/2007/08/04/evolution-and-catholicism-compatible-pope-says.htm . Happy to help, although I doubt that this will be the end of the discussion. --[[User:BillOhannity|BillOhannity]] 18:56, 30 November 2007 (EST)
Pope Benedict: ''This clash is an absurdity because on one hand there is much scientific proof in favour of evolution, which appears as a reality that we must see and which enriches our understanding of life and being as such.'' [http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22136550-5002700,00.html]
Additional sources:
[http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_jp02tc.htm]
[http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/8712_message_from_the_pope_1996_1_3_2001.asp][http://www.catholic.net/RCC/Periodicals/Dossier/0102-97/Article3.html][http://www.catholic.net/RCC/Issues/Pope-and-Evolution/pope-and-evolution.html][http://cuttingedge.org/n1034.html][http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/fbns/fbns269.html]
Were you looking for something more specific, or professional, or clear-cut, though? Or perhaps you think these speeches have been misinterpreted? Or just wildly spun and taken far out of context by the [[liberal]] media? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 19:24, 30 November 2007 (EST)
::::Mr. Aschlafly. In light of this enlightenment I suggest you rewrite the article [[Pangea]], its Old Earthism may erode your visitors faith: it may get them to believe in things from which disbelief in Christianity logically follows. While you are at it, perhaps review all the articles in the [[:Category:Geology]], there may be others amongst them promoting atheistic concepts. Perhaps some of the articles in the [[:Category:Astronomy]] also need rewritten. In the article [[Universe]], a meticulous Old Earthist explanation is set against a marginalised, weak descripton of the true Christian view which follows at the bottom of the page, giving the impression its not to be taken seriously.
::::Mr. Aschlafly. In light of this enlightenment I suggest you rewrite the article [[Pangea]], its Old Earthism may erode your visitors faith: it may get them to believe in things from which disbelief in Christianity logically follows. While you are at it, perhaps review all the articles in the [[:Category:Geology]], there may be others amongst them promoting atheistic concepts. Perhaps some of the articles in the [[:Category:Astronomy]] also need rewritten. In the article [[Universe]], a meticulous Old Earthist explanation is set against a marginalised, weak descripton of the true Christian view which follows at the bottom of the page, giving the impression its not to be taken seriously.