Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
994 bytes removed ,  20:49, December 1, 2007
rv to BethanyS
Line 29: Line 29:     
== Controversy ==
 
== Controversy ==
It is a matter of dispute whether it serves any valid purpose to distinguish between degrees or levels of torture. To some opponents, "torture is torture" and should always be prohibited. The US maintains that its [[coercive interrogation]] techniques are not "torture". While this position has met with considerable resistance from legal experts nationwide<ref>http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/04/06/usdom13130.htm</ref>, President [[George W. Bush]] vetoed the [[McCain Amendment]], which was intended to tighten the definition of torture.
+
It is a matter of dispute whether it serves any valid purpose to distinguish between degrees or levels of torture. To some opponents, "torture is torture" and should always be prohibited. The US maintains that its [[coercive interrogation]] techniques are not "[[torture]]". While this position has met with considerable resistance from legal experts nationwide<ref>http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/04/06/usdom13130.htm</ref>, President [[George W. Bush]] vetoed the [[McCain Amendment]], which was intended to tighten the definition of torture.  
 
  −
On June 21, 2004, secret Justice Departmentdocuments were released defining torture only as treatment that can cause, "organ failure or even death." The release of this definition of torture by the Justice Department spurred President Bush to appear on national television the very same day and clarify by saying, "I have never ordered torture. I will never order torture."
  −
 
  −
On December 19, 2005, the United States Congress passed a resolution placing a ban on "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment of "detainees." This ban was reinforced by the strongly split Supreme Court on June 30, 2006.
  −
 
  −
However, on October 8, 2007, the Justice Department and the CIA released a new memo which asserted that the methods of interogation they were using on the detainees did not count as torture as defined by the Congressional resolution. This has sparked another ongoing controversy between [[liberals]] and [[conservatives]] over the ethics the Bush Administration is using to interogate the detainees.
      
The signatories to the [[Geneva Convention]] <ref>http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva03.htm</ref> in 1949 defined relative classes of persons who may be considered "prisoners".  The Bush administration has classified [[terrorist]]s as [[unlawful combatant]]s not associated with any signatory power and maintain previous international conventions have not addressed this classification.
 
The signatories to the [[Geneva Convention]] <ref>http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva03.htm</ref> in 1949 defined relative classes of persons who may be considered "prisoners".  The Bush administration has classified [[terrorist]]s as [[unlawful combatant]]s not associated with any signatory power and maintain previous international conventions have not addressed this classification.
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,431

edits

Navigation menu