Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:  
* over 900 federal decisions have cited the [[Tax Injunction Act]], which withdrew [[federal jurisdiction]] from state tax issues
 
* over 900 federal decisions have cited the [[Tax Injunction Act]], which withdrew [[federal jurisdiction]] from state tax issues
 
* in ''Chance v. California'', 389 U.S. 89 (1967) (per curiam), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held in favor of obscenity cite by granting [[certiorari]] and reversing the decision below without a decision by the California Supreme Court and without a decision even by a Court of Appeals in California.  That is extremely unusual, and perhaps the only modern example of this.
 
* in ''Chance v. California'', 389 U.S. 89 (1967) (per curiam), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held in favor of obscenity cite by granting [[certiorari]] and reversing the decision below without a decision by the California Supreme Court and without a decision even by a Court of Appeals in California.  That is extremely unusual, and perhaps the only modern example of this.
 +
 +
One new suggestion for curbing judicial supremacy with respect to the citation of foreign law is for [[Congress]] to pass a law establishing evidentiary requirements before foreign practices or laws can be cited in federal court.
    
[[category:Essay]]
 
[[category:Essay]]
 
[[category:jurisdiction]]
 
[[category:jurisdiction]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Navigation menu