93
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: + + + + + + +
→Conflicting Opinions/Data
Mars' polar caps are melting.<ref>http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/07aug_southpole.htm</ref> Yet there is no proof of life on Mars.<ref>http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2005/feb/HQ_05052_mars_claim.html</ref> Therefore one can conclude that Mars' global warming is not caused by lifeforms. Global warming on Mars is caused by solar activity from the sun, which might hint at the cause of global warming on Earth.<ref>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html</ref>
Mars' polar caps are melting.<ref>http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/07aug_southpole.htm</ref> Yet there is no proof of life on Mars.<ref>http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2005/feb/HQ_05052_mars_claim.html</ref> Therefore one can conclude that Mars' global warming is not caused by lifeforms. Global warming on Mars is caused by solar activity from the sun, which might hint at the cause of global warming on Earth.<ref>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html</ref>
Al Gore is considered a leading expert on global warming because of his film. Some say that Gore backs the Kyoto treaties, although this was not the case in his earlier political career as Vice-President when he blocked the Kyoto treaties.<ref>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/July06/Frank18.htm</ref> Some argue that Al Gore does not follow his own advice.<ref>http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-08-09-gore-green_x.htm</ref> Some argue that Al Gore is not qualified to talk on scientific issues because he lacks a science degree.<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A37397-2000Mar18</ref
Some would argue that Al Gore damages the credibility of global warming because of these things.
If global warming is a theory, there is no need to force it on others. Yet the Weather Channel and the AMS was going to decertify weather people who don't strongly agree with the global warming theory. Thus trying to force the theory on others. <ref>http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming011807.htm</ref>
The public is simply asked to read the reports and believe them; however, those in the public and also fellow scientists that analyze the reports and ask questions about them are often silenced and threatened. <ref>http://www.rense.com/general75/oppo.htm</ref><ref>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53636</ref><ref>http://www.variousandsundry.com/politics/?p=810</ref><ref>http://www.newswithviews.com/metcalf/metcalf205.htm</ref> Some are even given death threats by pro-global warming scientists and advocates.<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/11/ngreen211.xml</ref>
== Global warming advocacy sites ==
== Global warming advocacy sites ==