Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Let's see some evidence
Line 49: Line 49:     
Isn't it nice how a bit of discussion can sort out these things?  :-)  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:24, 25 November 2007 (EST)
 
Isn't it nice how a bit of discussion can sort out these things?  :-)  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:24, 25 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
==Source of criticism==
 +
 +
Deleted material:
 +
 +
:The BBC repeatedly says it is 'independent' but it clearly has an agenda all of its own. Furthermore, although the BBC is technically not-for-profit, it has an enormous worldwide revenue from the resale of programmes and repeat fees, from the sale of CDs, videos, DVDs, and a wide range of books and magazines. It is a major publisher in its own right.
 +
 +
I think this is correct, but this is an encyclopedia, not a blog. This criticism needs reference to a quotation. Who charges that BBC has an agenda? (And what evidence do they give for this charge?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 20:09, 6 December 2007 (EST)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu