nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 625:
Line 625: + + + + + + + +
Lack of falsifiabilty
:No, it hasn't evolved: evolution is impossible. It's actually ''devolved'', which ''is'' possible! :-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:56, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:No, it hasn't evolved: evolution is impossible. It's actually ''devolved'', which ''is'' possible! :-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:56, 29 November 2007 (EST)
== Lack of falsifiabilty ==
Teddy added that atheistic theories of the origin of the moon lack "the falsifiability requirement of science" to the sentence that says that they have been proved false. If there were not falsifiable, then they could not be proven false.
I could accept that the sentence expresses something close to the truth, but as it is currently worded it contradicts itself.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:00, 7 December 2007 (EST)