541
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 106:
Line 106: + + + + + +
→Reason for short block
Wikis are ''to contribute information'', not delete it. In a dozen or so edits this afternoon, nearly every one has been to delete information or links or sources. For example, you deleted factually correct and informative information from [[young mass murderers]] on a technicality that his victims were injured by gunshots and did not immediately die. That can be handled by adding a footnote, not by deleting info. In the case of dead-end links, they can be handled by adding an entry for the link, not by deleting the link. Your pattern of removal was proceeding so quickly that a block became necessary.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:26, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Wikis are ''to contribute information'', not delete it. In a dozen or so edits this afternoon, nearly every one has been to delete information or links or sources. For example, you deleted factually correct and informative information from [[young mass murderers]] on a technicality that his victims were injured by gunshots and did not immediately die. That can be handled by adding a footnote, not by deleting info. In the case of dead-end links, they can be handled by adding an entry for the link, not by deleting the link. Your pattern of removal was proceeding so quickly that a block became necessary.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:26, 7 December 2007 (EST)
:...WOW.
:My removal from "Young Mass Murderers" wasn't a technicality. It was just me fixing factually incorrect information: There was no mass murder because nobody aside from the "killer" died, at least according to the article. You now say "did not '''immediately''' die" (emphasis mine), so how many people died from their wounds, and why aren't they listed as kills? As it stands, you got somebody who wounded a bunch of people before committing suicide, and you stamp him as a mass murderer just because it suits whatever point you want to make, it seems. Are we also counting the various prevented amok runs as mass murder (with a footnote that it was technically only intended mass murder)?
:Also: What is informative information? Is there uninformative information?
:And the delinking was me cleaning up behind one of your sysops: Conservative deleted articles (thus signaling that they were not wanted), but didn't remove the links pointing at them. That led to those links being in the Wanted Pages list. Would you rather like me to override a sysop decision and recreate those articles as I see fit?
:All in all, I'm '''extremely''' insulted for being blocked just because you failed to comprehend what I was doing. Normally, people would just '''ask''' if there was lack of clarity. I seriously thought that my "Removing reference to deleted article" was clear enough, especially when I then told Conservative how to help me in my efforts (before you blocked me). --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 16:44, 7 December 2007 (EST)