Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + + +
validity of transexualism?
:Covering the legal field again. As mentioned, Conway is ''legally'' a female, by legal fact. Publishing information that is knowingly contrary to fact about someone in order to evoke a negative opinion of that person is libel. It is by far in Conservapedia's, and everyone's interests to avoid defamation suits. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 19:49, 30 November 2007 (EST)
:Covering the legal field again. As mentioned, Conway is ''legally'' a female, by legal fact. Publishing information that is knowingly contrary to fact about someone in order to evoke a negative opinion of that person is libel. It is by far in Conservapedia's, and everyone's interests to avoid defamation suits. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 19:49, 30 November 2007 (EST)
::Whether some US state regards him as female is not relevant. Conservapedia has not (yet!) accepted the validity of transexualism as even being possible, let alone being ethical or "a right".
::We need an article on [[LGBT advocacy]] or the [[unisex movement]] or something like that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:09, 7 December 2007 (EST)