Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Cut digs: Ed, what's the controversy?
Line 38: Line 38:     
At Wikipedia, it's often hard to make fine distinctions like this, but here I have the luxury of being a sysop. If lazy or evil people try to put words in someone's mouth I can undo, protect and even block. But if is there a controversy over what Pax American is, then let's reveal the controversy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:11, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 
At Wikipedia, it's often hard to make fine distinctions like this, but here I have the luxury of being a sysop. If lazy or evil people try to put words in someone's mouth I can undo, protect and even block. But if is there a controversy over what Pax American is, then let's reveal the controversy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 00:11, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:Ed, what's the controversy? I'm simply stating the word PNAC uses to describe their own ideology. -[[User:RedBlade7|danq]] 13:40, 8 December 2007 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
571

edits

Navigation menu