Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + +
reply
The strongest argument here is still that the lifeboat problem is based on lack of faith - when you let someone die to let someone else survive, rather than believing that God will either save you all. I believe that in such a situation, God is the one who should decide who lives and dies. The whole argument is based on lack of faith and even though it opens up some very interesting discussions, it's a horrible way to learn "morals" to children in public schools. [[User:Hammet|Hammet]] 17:55, 9 December 2007 (EST)
The strongest argument here is still that the lifeboat problem is based on lack of faith - when you let someone die to let someone else survive, rather than believing that God will either save you all. I believe that in such a situation, God is the one who should decide who lives and dies. The whole argument is based on lack of faith and even though it opens up some very interesting discussions, it's a horrible way to learn "morals" to children in public schools. [[User:Hammet|Hammet]] 17:55, 9 December 2007 (EST)
: Right. Basically, the [[lifeboat problem]] is the equivalent of dividing both sides of a math equation by zero. By introducing fallacies and expelling [[faith]], everything goes wacky and it becomes an absurdity, which [[liberals]] then use to confuse and indoctrinate with illogical and immoral "solutions".--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:19, 9 December 2007 (EST)
==Is conservapedia advocating suicide?==
==Is conservapedia advocating suicide?==