Changes

So Conservapedia is actually ''factually'' documenting what creationists believe, whereas Beam was claiming that Conservapedia says this.

So Conservapedia is actually ''factually'' documenting what creationists believe, whereas Beam was claiming that Conservapedia says this.

However, the Conservapedia in question has not actually had the words "like all modern animals" for over two months prior to Beam's column being published, which makes one wonder about the veracity of his research.  Has he actually looked to see what Conservapedia says, or has he done his research by reading anti-Conservapedia web-sites?

However, the article in question has not actually had the words "like all modern animals" for over two months prior to Beam's column being published, which makes one wonder about the veracity of his research.  Has he actually looked to see what Conservapedia says, or has he done his research by reading anti-Conservapedia web-sites?

He mocks conservatives with "The yahoos aren't the only ones who hear what they want to hear and disregard the rest", but one must wonder if Beam has read what he wants to read and disregarded what was actually said.

He mocks conservatives with "The yahoos aren't the only ones who hear what they want to hear and disregard the rest", but one must wonder if Beam has read what he wants to read and disregarded what was actually said.

[[Category:Conservapedia Publicity]]

[[Category:Conservapedia Publicity]]