| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | ==Wikipedia and Bias== | | ==Wikipedia and Bias== |
| − | Conservapedia has an article that argues that Wikipedia has a [[liberal]] bias. [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|This list]] shows some examples of this alleged bias. | + | Conservapedia has an article that argues that Wikipedia has a [[liberal]] bias. [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|This list]] shows some examples of this alleged bias. |
| | | | |
| | + | ==Wikipedia and Homosexuality== |
| | + | |
| | + | A large percentage of Wikipedia Editors and Administrators have posted on their user pages they are either homosexuals or supporters of homosexuality and other deviant sexual behavior. Many of Wikipedia's entries on topics such as "Anal Sex" actively promote this deviant behavior and misrepresent the Bible and other funcdamental religous teachings as "outdated" or "fables". |
| | + | |
| | + | More recently, one of Wikipedia's self-proclaimed homosexual editors and admins, Essjay, was exposed as a fraud and had misrepresented his credentials, claiming to have four PhD degrees in religion. Wikipedia shows a pro-homosexual bias in the majority of its articles. Conservative critics of Wikipedia have commented the site appears to be dominated and misused by the militant homosexual movement as a propoganda vehicle for promoting homosexuality and other deviant lifestyles as "normal" and "natural". |
| | | | |
| | ==References== | | ==References== |