277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 140:
Line 140: + +
Debate:Atheism vs. Pastafarianism (view source)
Revision as of 18:09, December 11, 2007
, 18:09, December 11, 2007→It's not a religion
:The purpose of Pastafarianism was to protest the Kansas Board of Education's allowing of creationism to be taught in classrooms. The point being is that creationism should not be taught in schools simply because creationism is not scientific. [[User:Raymond|Raymond]] 18:37, 10 December 2007 (EST)
:The purpose of Pastafarianism was to protest the Kansas Board of Education's allowing of creationism to be taught in classrooms. The point being is that creationism should not be taught in schools simply because creationism is not scientific. [[User:Raymond|Raymond]] 18:37, 10 December 2007 (EST)
::The point of Pastafarianism is the same as any other attempt to belittle those that fit someone's political, religious view. Mockery through parady and childish satire which is also known as propaganda. Facts aren't even bothered with. The science behind the Creation is the same as the faithful evolutionist uses but of course excludes since it doesn't fit the belief system requirements of evolutionary theory. I can accept the fact that there are two views here and be tolerant of that point. What isn't acceptable in a country that protects the individual freedom to have that different point of view are that the faithful adherents of the sacred theory of evolution that won't allow other scientifically valid theories only because the challenge theirs. Proving therefore that it ultimately requires a faith like belief system in order for it to be kept alive. This is the whole point. You've yet to prove your theory (except to the faithful) so you can't exclude other theories.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 13:09, 11 December 2007 (EST)