Changes

: I've not studied the particular references you make, but the general principle that if you must either reject or accept everything that someone or some group says is fallacious.  There can be good reasons for rejecting some data whilst accepting other data, including some being factual research and the other being opinion, some being based on good research while the other is not, etc.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:04, 12 December 2007 (EST)

: I've not studied the particular references you make, but the general principle that if you must either reject or accept everything that someone or some group says is fallacious.  There can be good reasons for rejecting some data whilst accepting other data, including some being factual research and the other being opinion, some being based on good research while the other is not, etc.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:04, 12 December 2007 (EST)

Your point is well taken.  I am not familiar with the research either.  I was curious what the good reasons were "for rejecting some data whilst accepting other data", with regards to the information provided by the IPCC?

Your point is well taken.  I am not familiar with the research either.  I was curious what the good reasons were "for rejecting some data whilst accepting other data", with regards to the information provided by the IPCC? I attempted to check the validity of the source used to discredit Gore's and the URL no longer exists.  # ↑ http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT-REF30b.article.  None of the references used in the section discrediting Gore are valid, since the URL's no longer exist.

== Lead sentence suggestion ==

== Lead sentence suggestion ==