Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
747 bytes removed ,  08:10, December 13, 2007
no edit summary
Line 203: Line 203:     
(slaps own forehad) Darn! I shoulda thoughta [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Coins&rcid=378923 that category] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:55, 10 December 2007 (EST)
 
(slaps own forehad) Darn! I shoulda thoughta [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Coins&rcid=378923 that category] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:55, 10 December 2007 (EST)
−
  −
==Categories==
  −
  −
Hello Learn Together,
  −
  −
Anatomy and Physiology classifications can be tricky - most of the time the words are used in conjunction: "Anatomy and Physiology". If you insist on keeping them separate, then my opinion is it's best to categorize anything that deals with how cells, tissues, organs etc.. function/communicate under Physiology, while anatomy is usually reserved for just structure entries. For instance, a neurotransmitter or hormone would be a physiological entry, while a particular nerve, muscle, or bone would file under anatomy. Of course, you could just escape the confusion by just fusing the two categories into "Anatomy and Physiology". What do you think? [[User:Wisdom89|Wisdom89]] 12:04, 12 December 2007 (EST)
 
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu