nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89:
Line 89: + + + +
Consistency
:::: This should be discussed on the [[talk:Genocide|Genocide talk page]], not here. I'm more inclined to go along with your definition, SSchultz, but Andy is not claiming that these things didn't happen, the argument is simply about whether they are classified as Genocide or not. So calling Andy a "genocide denier" is out of line. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:08, 14 December 2007 (EST)
:::: This should be discussed on the [[talk:Genocide|Genocide talk page]], not here. I'm more inclined to go along with your definition, SSchultz, but Andy is not claiming that these things didn't happen, the argument is simply about whether they are classified as Genocide or not. So calling Andy a "genocide denier" is out of line. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:08, 14 December 2007 (EST)
== Consistency ==
We may wish to come to an understanding that includes [[Srebrenica massacre]] as well. As SSchultz has pointed out, the Srebrenica massacre specifically calls the event genocide and has genocide as its category. It appears this is currently inconsistent with the genocide article. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:08, 14 December 2007 (EST)