nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
675
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89:
Line 89: + +
→[[Genocide]]
:::: This should be discussed on the [[talk:Genocide|Genocide talk page]], not here. I'm more inclined to go along with your definition, SSchultz, but Andy is not claiming that these things didn't happen, the argument is simply about whether they are classified as Genocide or not. So calling Andy a "genocide denier" is out of line. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:08, 14 December 2007 (EST)
:::: This should be discussed on the [[talk:Genocide|Genocide talk page]], not here. I'm more inclined to go along with your definition, SSchultz, but Andy is not claiming that these things didn't happen, the argument is simply about whether they are classified as Genocide or not. So calling Andy a "genocide denier" is out of line. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:08, 14 December 2007 (EST)
::::: Philip, I appreciate you're willing to hear out my side of the argument, but I stand by labelling Andy as a genocide denier. For example, there are individuals who admit that the Holocaust did happen, but claim that it was nowhere near 6 million Jews killed, and these individuals are referred to as Holocaust deniers. Likewise, Andy admits that 8000 men and boys were murdered in Srebrenica, but refuses to call it genocide based on various illogical technicalities. This makes him a genocide denier. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 20:33, 14 December 2007 (EST)
== Consistency ==
== Consistency ==