9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − Of course I see incest as illicit, do you not? Incest within humans produces deformaties and that are not produced in incest within the animal kingdom. The Book of Leviticus states that incest is a sin and i fail to see the merits of the creation of only two humans.+
User talk:DarkMessiah (view source)
Revision as of 14:38, December 15, 2007
, 14:38, December 15, 2007no edit summary
:Assuming you are aware of evolutionary theory, then you are aware that incest was the primary means of reproduction for billions of years. So what do you have against the evolutionary view? Would you prefer we never existed? [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 23:56, 10 December 2007 (EST)
:Assuming you are aware of evolutionary theory, then you are aware that incest was the primary means of reproduction for billions of years. So what do you have against the evolutionary view? Would you prefer we never existed? [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 23:56, 10 December 2007 (EST)
:: course I see incest as illicit, do you not? Incest within humans produces deformaties and that are not produced in incest within the animal kingdom. The Book of Leviticus states that incest is a sin and i fail to see the merits of the creation of only two humans. You have also answered my question with another question. [[User:DarkMessiah|DarkMessiah]] 09:38, 15 December 2007 (EST)