9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 219:
Line 219: + + + + + + +
User talk:Learn together (view source)
Revision as of 14:40, December 15, 2007
, 14:40, December 15, 2007no edit summary
(slaps own forehad) Darn! I shoulda thoughta [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Coins&rcid=378923 that category] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:55, 10 December 2007 (EST)
(slaps own forehad) Darn! I shoulda thoughta [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Coins&rcid=378923 that category] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:55, 10 December 2007 (EST)
"If the entire human race comes from just Adam and Eve, then surely we are all the children of illicit, incestuous sex. How can this be justified?" DarkMessiah 12:52, 6 December 2007 (EST)
:What in your worldview would make you believe it is "illicit"?
:Assuming you are aware of evolutionary theory, then you are aware that incest was the primary means of reproduction for billions of years. So what do you have against the evolutionary view? Would you prefer we never existed? Learn together 23:56, 10 December 2007 (EST)
::Of course I see incest as illicit, do you not? Incest within humans produces deformaties and that are not produced in incest within the animal kingdom. The Book of Leviticus states that incest is a sin and i fail to see the merits of the creation of only two humans. You have also answered my question with another question. [[User:DarkMessiah|DarkMessiah]] 09:40, 15 December 2007 (EST)